A Critique of Olfactory Objects

dc.contributor.authorBarwich, Ann Sophie
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T16:02:16Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T16:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-12
dc.description.abstractDoes the sense of smell involve the perception of odor objects? General discussion of perceptual objecthood centers on three criteria: stimulus representation, perceptual constancy, and figure-ground segregation. These criteria, derived from theories of vision, have been applied to olfaction in recent philosophical debates about psychology. An inherent problem with such framing of olfactory objecthood is that philosophers explicitly ignore the constitutive factors of the sensory systems that underpin the implementation of these criteria. The biological basis of odor coding is fundamentally different from the coding principles of the visual system. This article analyzes the three measures of perceptual objecthood against the biological background of the olfactory system. It contrasts the coding principles in olfaction with the visual system to show why these criteria of objecthood fail to be instantiated in odor perception. The argument demonstrates that olfaction affords perceptual categorization without the need to form odor objects.
dc.identifier.citationBarwich, Ann Sophie. "A Critique of Olfactory Objects." Frontiers in Psychology, 2019-06-12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01337.
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 4497
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/31340
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01337
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581715
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.rightsThis work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.
dc.titleA Critique of Olfactory Objects

Files

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us