Multi-level computational methods for interdisciplinary research in the HathiTrust Digital Library

dc.contributor.authorMurdock, Jaimie
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Colin Frederick
dc.contributor.authorBorner, Katy
dc.contributor.authorLight, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMcAlister, Simon
dc.contributor.authorRavenscroft, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorRose, Robert
dc.contributor.authorRose, Doori
dc.contributor.authorOtsuka, Jun
dc.contributor.authorBourget, David
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, John
dc.contributor.authorReed, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T16:12:17Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T16:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-18
dc.description.abstractWe show how faceted search using a combination of traditional classification systems and mixed-membership topic models can go beyond keyword search to inform resource discovery, hypothesis formulation, and argument extraction for interdisciplinary research. Our test domain is the history and philosophy of scientific work on animal mind and cognition. The methods can be generalized to other research areas and ultimately support a system for semi-automatic identification of argument structures. We provide a case study for the application of the methods to the problem of identifying and extracting arguments about anthropomorphism during a critical period in the development of comparative psychology. We show how a combination of classification systems and mixed-membership models trained over large digital libraries can inform resource discovery in this domain. Through a novel approach of “drill-down” topic modeling—simultaneously reducing both the size of the corpus and the unit of analysis—we are able to reduce a large collection of fulltext volumes to a much smaller set of pages within six focal volumes containing arguments of interest to historians and philosophers of comparative psychology. The volumes identified in this way did not appear among the first ten results of the keyword search in the HathiTrust digital library and the pages bear the kind of “close reading” needed to generate original interpretations that is the heart of scholarly work in the humanities. Zooming back out, we provide a way to place the books onto a map of science originally constructed from very different data and for different purposes. The multilevel approach advances understanding of the intellectual and societal contexts in which writings are interpreted.
dc.identifier.citationMurdock, Jaimie, et al. "Multi-level computational methods for interdisciplinary research in the HathiTrust Digital Library." PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 9, 2017-9-18, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184188.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 122
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/32749
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184188
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184188
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONE
dc.titleMulti-level computational methods for interdisciplinary research in the HathiTrust Digital Library

Files

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us