Race and Representation Revisited: The New Racial Gerrymandering Cases and Section 2 of the VRA

dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Rohwer, Luis
dc.contributor.authorCharles, Guy-Uriel E
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T15:52:50Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T15:52:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-16
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the Supreme Court's new racial gerrymandering cases and argue that those cases are on a collision course with Section 2 of the VRA. We revisit the Shaw line of cases and explain that the Shaw cases were more sympathetic to the representational rights of voters of color than are the new racial gerrymandering cases. This is primarily because the Shaw cases made room within the doctrine for the state to pursue descriptive representation for voters of color. We argue that new racial gerrymandering cases are inimical to descriptive representation. To the extent that voting rights scholars and activists care about descriptive representation, they should be wary of the racial gerrymandering cases.
dc.identifier.citationFuentes-Rohwer, Luis, and Charles, Guy-Uriel E. "Race and Representation Revisited: The New Racial Gerrymandering Cases and Section 2 of the VRA." William & Mary Law Review, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1559-1600, 2018-05-16.
dc.identifier.issn2374-8524
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 2358
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/31278
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2679/
dc.relation.journalWilliam & Mary Law Review
dc.titleRace and Representation Revisited: The New Racial Gerrymandering Cases and Section 2 of the VRA

Files

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us