Styles of Reasoning in Biology: The Case of Models in Membrane and Cell Biology
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
This paper investigates one of the great achievements of twentiethcentury cell biology: determining the structure of the cell membrane. This case differs in important ways from the better-known case of the identification of the DNA double helix as the carrier of genetic information, especially regarding the evaluation of potential evidence in light of prior theoretical commitments. Whereas it has been argued that adherence to a structural hypothesis enabled Watson and Crick to ignore a surplus of (potentially confusing) empirical findings, similar adherence to an elegant and universal structural hypothesis, we argue, unduly shielded the so-called ‘unit-membrane’ model from legitimate challenges on the basis of known phenomena.
Description
Keywords
modern, experiment, technology, structure of theories, biology, the interplay between experimental data, theoretical models, and technological practices in the research of the cell's membrane
Citation
Journal
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Downstream publication: Gelfert, Axel & Mok, Jacob. (2017) "Saving Models from Phenomena: A Cautionary Tale from Membrane and Cell Biology." Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: Problems, Perspectives, and Case Studies, 17-30.