Intertemporal Substitution in Health Care Demand: Evidence from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment

Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Date

2019-07-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Nonlinear cost-sharing in health insurance encourages intertemporal substitution be- cause patients can reduce their out-of-pocket costs by concentrating spending in years when they hit the deductible. We test for such intertemporal substitution using data from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, where people were randomly assigned either to a free care plan or to a cost-sharing plan which had coinsurance up to a maximum dollar expenditure (MDE). Hitting the MDE—leading to an effective price of zero—has a bigger effect on monthly health care spending and utilization than does being in free care, because people who hit the MDE face high future and past prices. As a result, we estimate that sensitivity to short-lasting price changes is about twice as large as sensitivity to long-lasting changes. These findings help reconcile conflicting estimates of the price elasticity of demand for health care, and suggest that high deductible health plans may be less effective than hoped in controlling health care spending.

Description

This record is for a(n) postprint of an article published in Journal of Public Economics on 2019-07-01; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.04.006.

Keywords

Citation

Lin, Haizhen, and Sacks, Dan. "Intertemporal Substitution in Health Care Demand: Evidence from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment." Journal of Public Economics, vol. 175, pp. 29-43, 2019-07-01, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.04.006.

Journal

Journal of Public Economics

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type