Waste and Value: Thorstein Veblen and H. G. Wells
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2006
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Permanent Link
Abstract
Introducing Filth: Dirt, Disgust, and Modern Life, William Cohen declares: “polluting or filthy objects” can “become conceivably productive, the discarded sources in which riches may lie.” “Riches,” though, have often been construed as “waste.” The reversibility of the poles -- wealth and waste, waste and wealth -- became especially apparent with the advent of a so-called consumer society dur- ing the latter half of the nineteenth century. A number of the first analysts of that economistic way of understanding modernity, including Thorstein Veblen and H. G. Wells, made this reversibility central to their ideas. But such reversibility has a much longer history, involving a general shift from economic and social theories that seek to make clear distinctions between wealth and waste to modern ones where the distinctions blur, as in Veblen and Wells; in some versions of post-modernism the distinctions dissolve altogether.
Description
Keywords
value, waste, late capitalism, transatlantic literary studies
Citation
Patrick Brantlinger and Richard Higgins. Waste and Value: Thorstein Veblen and H. G. Wells. Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 48.4 (Fall 2006): 453–475.
Journal
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article