Credibility or Credulity? Examining Political Organization-Public Relationships in an Election of Interloping Candidates
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
2017-11-08
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
This national online survey (N = 493) examined the political organization-public relationship (POPR) that voters perceived with their own political party and their opposing political party, as well as voters’ assessment of the credibility of candidates running for president during the primary season of the 2016 election. Results indicated that although credibility assessment of one’s own party’s candidate was much as expected, POPR with the Democratic Party was generally stronger than that with the Republican Party. Data showed no evidence that a poor POPR with one’s own party would drive voters to support interloper candidates. We conclude by reflecting on the importance of POPR with the opposing party and what weak relationships may mean for parties in the long term.
Description
This record is for a(n) postprint of an article published in Journal of Public Relations Research on 2017-11-08; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2017.1388240.
Keywords
Citation
Sweetser, Kaye D., and Browning, Nicholas Paul. "Credibility or Credulity? Examining Political Organization-Public Relationships in an Election of Interloping Candidates." Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 29, no. 5, 2017-11-8, https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2017.1388240.
Journal
Journal of Public Relations Research