Gregory of Rimini and Peter of Ailly: Are Mental Sentences Composed of Parts?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

William of Ockham held that, with a few exceptions, the structure of spoken and written sentences mirrored that of mental language, at least with respect to features affecting truth and falsehood. Gregory of Rimini and Peter of Ailly rejected this view. This paper focuses on two of their arguments, one pertaining to word-order in mental language, the other to the mental copula. I conclude that their arguments are ones Ockham cannot answer without complicating his theory of mental language more than he would likely have been willing to do.

Description

Versions of this paper were read at the Southeastern Medieval Association Meetings held in Richmond, Va., March 24–26, 1977, and at the Twelfth Kalamazoo Conference on the Middle Ages, Kalamazoo, Mich., May 5–8, 1977.

Keywords

Mental Language, Middle Ages, Medieval Philosophy, Ockham, William of Ockham, Gregory of Rimini, Peter of Ailly, Pierre d'Ailly, Concepts and Insolubles, Complexe significabile, Mental Language Properly So Called, Mental Language Improperly So Called, Word-Order, Word Order, Syncategoremata, Copula

Citation

Journal

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

“Gregory of Rimini and Peter of Ailly: Are Mental Sentences Composed of Parts?,” by Paul Vincent Spade, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Type

Article