Gregory of Rimini and Peter of Ailly: Are Mental Sentences Composed of Parts?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Other Version

External File or Record

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

William of Ockham held that, with a few exceptions, the structure of spoken and written sentences mirrored that of mental language, at least with respect to features affecting truth and falsehood. Gregory of Rimini and Peter of Ailly rejected this view. This paper focuses on two of their arguments, one pertaining to word-order in mental language, the other to the mental copula. I conclude that their arguments are ones Ockham cannot answer without complicating his theory of mental language more than he would likely have been willing to do.

Series and Number:

EducationalLevel:

Is Based On:

Target Name:

Teaches:

Table of Contents

Description

Versions of this paper were read at the Southeastern Medieval Association Meetings held in Richmond, Va., March 24–26, 1977, and at the Twelfth Kalamazoo Conference on the Middle Ages, Kalamazoo, Mich., May 5–8, 1977.

Citation

Journal

DOI

Rights

“Gregory of Rimini and Peter of Ailly: Are Mental Sentences Composed of Parts?,” by Paul Vincent Spade, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.