Moving Upstream: The Role of Tobacco Clean Air Restrictions on Educational Inequalities in Smoking Among Young Adults

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2019-08-06

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Demography

Abstract

Education affords a range of direct and indirect benefits that promote longer and healthier lives, and stratify health lifestyles. We use tobacco clean air policies to examine whether policies that apply universally—interventions that bypass individuals’ unequal access and ability to employ flexible resources to avoid health hazards—have an effect on educational inequalities in health behaviors. We test theoretically informed but competing hypotheses that these policies either amplify or attenuate the association between education and smoking behavior. Our results provide evidence that interventions that “move upstream” to apply universally regardless of individual educational attainment, here tobacco clean air policies, are particularly effective among young adults with the lowest levels of parental or individual educational attainment. These findings provide important evidence that upstream approaches may disrupt persistent educational inequalities in health behaviors. In doing so, they provide opportunities to intervene on behaviors in early adulthood that contribute to disparities in morbidity and mortality later in the life course. These findings also help assuage concerns that tobacco clean air policies increase educational inequalities in smoking by stigmatizing those with the fewest resources.

Description

Postprint, accepted manuscript

Keywords

Education, Smoking bans, Tobacco Use, Health inequality, Policy intervention

Citation

Hernandez, Elaine M., Michael Vuolo, Brian C. Kelly, and Laura C. Frizzell.2019.“Moving Upstream: The Role of Tobacco Clean Air Restrictions on Educational Inequalities in Smoking among Young Adults.”Demography 56(5):1693-1721. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-019-00805-2

Journal

Relation

Rights

Type

Article