Galileo's Refutation of the Speed-Distance Law of Fall Rehabilitated

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2010
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall in his Two New Sciences is routinely dismissed as a moment of confused argumentation. We urge that Galileo's argument correctly identified why the speed-distance law is untenable, failing only in its very last step. Using an ingenious combination of scaling and self-similarity arguments, Galileo found correctly that bodies, falling from rest according to this law, fall all distances in equal times. What he failed to recognize in the last step is that this time is infinite, the result of an exponential dependence of distance on time. Instead, Galileo conflated it with the other motion that satisfies this ‘equal time’ property, instantaneous motion.
Description
Keywords
renaissance and early modern, physics, mechanics, Galileo, intellectual history
Citation
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Preprint, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9123/
Downstream publication: Roberts, Bryan & Norton, John. (2012) "Galileo's Refutation of the Speed-Distance Law of Fall Rehabilitated." Centaurus, 54(2), 148-164.
Relation
Rights
Type
Collections