Responses to discussion about “Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions”

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Andrew W.
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Kathryn A.
dc.contributor.authorAllison, David B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T20:30:35Z
dc.date.available2018-05-16T20:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-16
dc.descriptionN.B. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their universities or any other organization.
dc.description.abstractThere has been some spirited online dialogue regarding our recently published paper, “Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions” (http://www.pnas.org/content/115/11/2563), particularly around two paragraphs with headings “Comment on studies, data, methods, and logic, not authors” and “Respectfully raise potential concerns about invalidating errors (or plausible misconduct) and allow for due process.” We very much appreciate the opportunity to provide additional insights and perspectives on these two sections about civility and due process. View/Open PDF file below.
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.5967/K898855V
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/22126
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSchool of Public Health
dc.relation.isbasedonhttp://www.pnas.org/content/115/11/2563
dc.rightsThis work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.
dc.titleResponses to discussion about “Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions”
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Responses to discussion about Brown, Kaiser, and Allison PNAS 2018 - 180....pdf
Size:
119.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Research
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us