Responses to discussion about “Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions”

Thumbnail Image

Files

Responses to discussion about Brown, Kaiser, and Allison PNAS 2018 - 180....pdf (119.22 KB)
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2018-05-16

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

School of Public Health

Permanent Link

https://hdl.handle.net/2022/22126

Abstract

There has been some spirited online dialogue regarding our recently published paper, “Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions” (http://www.pnas.org/content/115/11/2563), particularly around two paragraphs with headings “Comment on studies, data, methods, and logic, not authors” and “Respectfully raise potential concerns about invalidating errors (or plausible misconduct) and allow for due process.” We very much appreciate the opportunity to provide additional insights and perspectives on these two sections about civility and due process. View/Open PDF file below.

Description

N.B. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their universities or any other organization.

Keywords

Citation

Journal

DOI

doi.org/10.5967/K898855V

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type

Article

Collections

Faculty Research