Phishing IQ Tests Measure Fear, Not Ability

dc.contributor.authorAnandpara, Vivek; Dingman, Andrew; Jakobsson, Markus; Liu, Debin; Roinestad, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-12T21:16:18Z
dc.date.available2025-11-12T21:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2007-01
dc.description.abstractWe argue that phishing IQ tests fail to measure susceptibility to phishing attacks. We conducted a study where 40 subjects were asked to answer a selection of questions from existing phishing IQ tests in which we varied the portion (from 25\% to 100\%) of the questions that corresponded to phishing webpages. We did not find any correlation between the {\em actual} number of phishing webpages and the number of webpages that the subjects indicated were phishing webpages. Therefore, the tests did not measure the ability of the subjects. To further confirm this, we exposed all the subjects to existing phishing education after they had taken the test, after which each subject was asked to take a second phishing test, with the same design as the first one, but with different questions. The number of sites that were indicated as being phishing webpages in the second test was, again, independent of the {\em actual} number of phishing webpages in the test. However, a substantially larger portion of stimuli was indicated as being phishing webpages in the second test, suggesting that the only measurable effect of the phishing education (from the point of view of the phishing IQ test) was an increased concern---not an increased ability.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/34481
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIndiana University Computer Science Technical Reports; TR643
dc.rightsThis work is protected by copyright unless stated otherwise.
dc.rights.uri
dc.titlePhishing IQ Tests Measure Fear, Not Ability

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TR643.pdf
Size:
210.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us