Numbers and Results vs. Reality and Fate: The Academic Language of Linguistics and Literary Studies

dc.contributor.authorAndresen, Melanie
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T15:31:54Z
dc.date.available2019-03-04T15:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-20
dc.description.abstractThe two academic disciplines linguistics and literary studies are often part of one common study program, but they differ in many respects: Their object of study, the methods they use, the type of knowledge they aim to generate, and also the presentation of their work in academic writing. I explore these differences by examining a corpus of German PhD theses from the two disciplines. The focus of this talk will be twofold: First, I will discuss how we can identify differences between corpora in a data-driven way, i. e. with only few theoretical assumptions. While many data-driven approaches rely on surface-based frequencies of words and sequences of words, I argue for the additional use of syntactic annotations for this purpose. Second, I will present and contextualize the differences between academic texts in linguistics and literary studies that can be detected in this way. I conclude by reflecting more generally on how the results of a data-driven analysis can be integrated into existing theories.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/22769
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIndiana University Digital Collections Services
dc.relation.isversionofClick on the link below to play this video.
dc.relation.urihttps://purl.dlib.indiana.edu/iudl/media/029p097p16
dc.subjectData-driven analysis
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectLiterary studies
dc.titleNumbers and Results vs. Reality and Fate: The Academic Language of Linguistics and Literary Studies
dc.typePresentation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
19-02-20_Andresen.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us