A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

dc.contributor.authorVerbruggen, Frederick
dc.contributor.authorAron, Adam R
dc.contributor.authorBand, Guido PH
dc.contributor.authorBeste, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBissett, Patrick G
dc.contributor.authorBrockett, Adam T
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Joshua W
dc.contributor.authorChamberlain, Samuel R
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Christopher D
dc.contributor.authorColonius, Hans
dc.contributor.authorColzato, Lorenza S
dc.contributor.authorCorneil, Brian D
dc.contributor.authorCoxon, James P
dc.contributor.authorDupuis, Annie
dc.contributor.authorEagle, Dawn M
dc.contributor.authorGaravan, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorGreenhouse, Ian
dc.contributor.authorHeathcote, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHuster, René J
dc.contributor.authorJahfari, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKenemans, J Leon
dc.contributor.authorLeunissen, Inge
dc.contributor.authorLi, Chiang-Shan R
dc.contributor.authorLogan, Gordon D
dc.contributor.authorMatzke, Dora
dc.contributor.authorMorein-Zamir, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorMurthy, Aditya
dc.contributor.authorParé, Martin
dc.contributor.authorPoldrack, Russell A
dc.contributor.authorRidderinkhof, K Richard
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, Trevor W
dc.contributor.authorRoesch, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorRubia, Katya
dc.contributor.authorSchachar, Russell J
dc.contributor.authorSchall, Jeffrey D
dc.contributor.authorStock, Ann-Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorSwann, Nicole C
dc.contributor.authorThakkar, Katharine N
dc.contributor.authorMolen, Maurits W van der
dc.contributor.authorVermeylen, Luc
dc.contributor.authorVink, Matthijs
dc.contributor.authorWessel, Jan R
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, Robert
dc.contributor.authorZandbelt, Bram B
dc.contributor.authorBoehler, C Nico
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T16:19:25Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T16:19:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-29
dc.description.abstractResponse inhibition is essential for navigating everyday life. Its derailment is considered integral to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, and more generally, to a wide range of behavioral and health problems. Response-inhibition efficiency furthermore correlates with treatment outcome in some of these conditions. The stop-signal task is an essential tool to determine how quickly response inhibition is implemented. Despite its apparent simplicity, there are many features (ranging from task design to data analysis) that vary across studies in ways that can easily compromise the validity of the obtained results. Our goal is to facilitate a more accurate use of the stop-signal task. To this end, we provide 12 easy-to-implement consensus recommendations and point out the problems that can arise when they are not followed. Furthermore, we provide user-friendly open-source resources intended to inform statistical-power considerations, facilitate the correct implementation of the task, and assist in proper data analysis.
dc.identifier.citationVerbruggen, Frederick, et al. "A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task." eLife, vol. 8, 2019-04-29, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46323.
dc.identifier.issn2050-084X
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 4669
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/31407
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46323
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6533084
dc.relation.journaleLife
dc.titleA consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

Files

Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us