Uninhibited Institutionalisms

dc.contributor.authorAlvesson, Mats
dc.contributor.authorHallett, Timothy Paul
dc.contributor.authorSpicer, Andre
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T16:57:56Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T16:57:56Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-10
dc.descriptionThis record is for a(n) postprint of an article published in Journal of Management Inquiry on 2019-01-10; the version of record is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618822777.
dc.description.abstractInstitutional theory (IT) is a very influential set of approaches in organization studies. There is increasing critique that the set is becoming uninhibited: too broad, dispersed, and confusing. Efforts to rejuvinate the field(s) have led to all-embracing definitions and efforts to account for too much, which makes it difficult to identify what is distinct about the assembly of research. This article discusses critically the state of IT and suggests some reconceptualizations of institution and institutional theory and points at some alternative lines of development.
dc.description.versionpostprint
dc.identifier.citationAlvesson, Mats, et al. "Uninhibited Institutionalisms." Journal of Management Inquiry, 2019-01-10, https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618822777.
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 5347
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/32557
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618822777
dc.relation.journalJournal of Management Inquiry
dc.titleUninhibited Institutionalisms

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5347_Uninhibited-Institutionalisms.pdf
Size:
557.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us