Resource Allocation Contests: Experimental Evidence
| dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shupp, Robert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Walker, James | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-08-14T14:30:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2007-08-14T14:30:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006-08-29 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Across many forms of rent seeking contests, the impact of risk aversion on equilibrium play is indeterminate. We design an experiment to compare individuals’ decisions across three contests which are isomorphic under risk-neutrality, but are typically not isomorphic under other risk preferences. The pattern of individual play across our contests is not consistent with a Bayes-Nash equilibrium for any distribution of risk preferences. We show that replacing the Bayes-Nash equilibrium concept with the quantal response equilibrium, along with heterogeneous risk preferences can produce equilibrium patterns of play that are very similar to the patterns we observe. | |
| dc.format.extent | 155989 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ssrn.com/abstract=932678 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.indiana.edu/~caepr/RePEc/PDF/CAEPR2006-004.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2022/1837 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | CAEPR Working Papers | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2006-004 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | This paper is also available on RePEc and SSRN. | |
| dc.rights | This work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated. | |
| dc.subject | CAEPR | |
| dc.subject | Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research | |
| dc.subject | rent seeking | |
| dc.subject | experiments | |
| dc.subject | risk aversion | |
| dc.subject | game theory | |
| dc.title | Resource Allocation Contests: Experimental Evidence | |
| dc.type | Working Paper |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Collections
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us