Resolving a Controversy: The Non-Classical Ion Debate

dc.contributor.authorWilliam Goodwin
dc.contributor.otherGrant Ramsay
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines a scientific controversy that raged for twenty years in physical organic chemistry during the second half of the twentieth century. After explaining what was at stake in the Non-Classical Ion Debate, I attempt—by examining the methodological reflections of some of the participants—a partial explanation of why this debate was so difficult to resolve. Instead of suggesting a breakdown of scientific method or the futility of appeals to evidence, the endurance of this controversy instead reveals the heuristic character of many of the explanations and predictions generated by theoretical organic chemistry. The results in this case are used to suggest a new role for the study of scientific controversies in revealing the economics of inquiry in scientific fields.
dc.relation.ispartofseries3; Open: 7
dc.subjectmodern, contemporary
dc.subjectstructure of theories
dc.subjectchemistry, organic chemistry
dc.subjecthistory of chemistry, scientific explanation, theory/observation
dc.titleResolving a Controversy: The Non-Classical Ion Debate
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Resolving a Controversy.pdf
60.59 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to so that they may create one and provide it to you.