The Relationship Between Situated Cognition and Anchored Instruction: A Response to Tripp

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Joyce L.
dc.contributor.authorLin, Xiaodong
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Daniel L.
dc.contributor.authorPetrosino, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Daniel T.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Olin
dc.contributor.authorHmelo, Cindy
dc.contributor.authorThe Cognition and Technology Group
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T15:24:02Z
dc.date.available2019-04-15T15:24:02Z
dc.date.issued1994-10
dc.description.abstractTripp's analysis of our article begins with a variant of the 'We love you, but. .. " structure that is often used by reviewers and always dreaded by reviewees (i.e., "I have the greatest respect for the work the Vanderbilt Group is doing. However ... ," Tripp, 1993, p. 75). His "however" involves two "small" points of contention. First, he states that what we are doing is not situated learning; second, we are not teaching problem solving. Needless to say, these two claims by Tripp caught our attention because they suggested a perspective on our work that was novel to us.
dc.identifier.citationMoore, J. L., Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., Petrosino, A., Hickey, D. T., Cambell, O., Hmelo, C., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction: A response to Tripp. Educational Technology, 34, 28-32.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/22918
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEducational Technology
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44428227
dc.rightsThis work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Situated Cognition and Anchored Instruction: A Response to Tripp
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Relationship Between Situated Cognition.pdf
Size:
226.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us