The Relationship Between Situated Cognition and Anchored Instruction: A Response to Tripp
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Educational Technology
Permanent Link
Abstract
Tripp's analysis of our article begins with a variant of the 'We love you, but. .. " structure that is often used by reviewers and always dreaded by reviewees (i.e., "I have the greatest respect for the work the Vanderbilt Group is doing. However ... ," Tripp, 1993, p. 75). His "however" involves two "small" points of contention. First, he states that what we are doing is not situated learning; second, we are not teaching problem solving. Needless to say, these two claims by Tripp caught our attention because they suggested a perspective on our work that was novel to us.
Table of Contents
Description
Keywords
Citation
Moore, J. L., Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., Petrosino, A., Hickey, D. T., Cambell, O., Hmelo, C., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction: A response to Tripp. Educational Technology, 34, 28-32.