The Relationship Between Situated Cognition and Anchored Instruction: A Response to Tripp
Loading...
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
1994-10
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Educational Technology
Permanent Link
Abstract
Tripp's analysis of our article begins with a variant of the 'We love you, but. .. " structure that is often used by reviewers and always dreaded by reviewees (i.e., "I have the greatest respect for the work the Vanderbilt Group is doing. However ... ," Tripp, 1993, p. 75). His "however" involves two "small" points of contention. First, he states that what we are doing is not situated learning; second, we are not teaching problem solving. Needless to say, these two claims by Tripp caught our attention because they suggested a perspective on our work that was novel to us.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Moore, J. L., Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., Petrosino, A., Hickey, D. T., Cambell, O., Hmelo, C., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction: A response to Tripp. Educational Technology, 34, 28-32.
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article