Reply to Gregory Landini’s Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Date
2009-06
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Axiomathes
Permanent Link
Abstract
In our discussion of Greg Landini's review, we should distinguish how the logical systems $\lambda$$HST$* and $HST^*_\lambda$ that I have developed are to be understood in my reconstructions of Gottlob Frege's and Bertrand Russell's (1903) ontologies as opposed to how $HST^*_\lambda$ is understood as a (proper) part of my ontology of conceptual realism. Both of these systems are type-free second-order predicate logics that allow predicate expressions (complex or simple) and formulas (propositional forms) to be nominalized and occur in formulas as abstract singular terms.
Description
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Axiomathes. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9060-9
Keywords
Propositional Attitude Definite Description Intensional Object Conceptual Realism Complex Predicate, Propositional Attitude, Definite Description, Intensional Object, Conceptual Realism, Complex Predicate
Citation
Cocchiarella, N. "Reply to Gregory Landini's Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism," Axiomathes, vol. 19, no. 2 (2009): 143-153.
Journal
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article