Reply to Gregory Landini’s Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.

Date

2009-06

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Axiomathes

Abstract

In our discussion of Greg Landini's review, we should distinguish how the logical systems $\lambda$$HST$* and $HST^*_\lambda$ that I have developed are to be understood in my reconstructions of Gottlob Frege's and Bertrand Russell's (1903) ontologies as opposed to how $HST^*_\lambda$ is understood as a (proper) part of my ontology of conceptual realism. Both of these systems are type-free second-order predicate logics that allow predicate expressions (complex or simple) and formulas (propositional forms) to be nominalized and occur in formulas as abstract singular terms.

Description

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Axiomathes. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9060-9

Keywords

Propositional Attitude Definite Description Intensional Object Conceptual Realism Complex Predicate, Propositional Attitude, Definite Description, Intensional Object, Conceptual Realism, Complex Predicate

Citation

Cocchiarella, N. "Reply to Gregory Landini's Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism," Axiomathes, vol. 19, no. 2 (2009): 143-153.

Journal

Relation

Rights

Type

Article