Reply to Gregory Landini’s Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism

is understood as a (proper) part of my ontology of conceptual realism. Both of these systems are type-free second-order predicate logics that allow predicate expressions (complex or simple) and formulas (propositional forms) to be nominalized and occur in formulas as abstract singular terms.

Description

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Axiomathes. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9060-9

Keywords

Propositional Attitude Definite Description Intensional Object Conceptual Realism Complex Predicate, Propositional Attitude, Definite Description, Intensional Object, Conceptual Realism, Complex Predicate

Citation

Cocchiarella, N. "Reply to Gregory Landini's Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism," Axiomathes, vol. 19, no. 2 (2009): 143-153.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-009-9060-9

Rights

This work may be protected by copyright unless otherwise stated.

Type

Article

Collections

Nino Cocchiarella Collection

Full item page

Reply to Gregory Landini’s Review of Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism

Files

Other Version

External File or Record

Date

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Permanent Link

Abstract

Series and Number:

EducationalLevel:

Is Based On:

Target Name:

Teaches:

Table of Contents