Strengths and Weaknesses of Sub-Workflow Interoperability
| dc.contributor.author | Plale, Beth; Withana, Eran Chinthaka; Herath, Chathura; Chandrasekar, Kavitha; Luo, Yuan; Terkhorn, Felix | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-13T20:59:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-13T20:59:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Workflow orchestration tools have gained recognitionfor their role in scientific discovery. As the number ofworkflows proliferate, reuse and reproducibility become issuesof importance. Reuse of a workflow is enhanced when thesystem on which it runs guarantees execution. An increasinglyprevalent of reuse however, begs for interoperability betweenworkflow systems. We carried out a comparative evaluationof the practicality of workflow interoperability by focusing onsub-workflow interoperability and evaluating different systemswithin that form. The approach shows surprisingly uniformperformance, relegating the tradeoffs to qualitative differences. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2022/34542 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Indiana University Computer Science Technical Reports; TR699 | |
| dc.rights | This work is protected by copyright unless stated otherwise. | |
| dc.rights.uri | ||
| dc.title | Strengths and Weaknesses of Sub-Workflow Interoperability |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Collections
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us