Persuasion and Coercion in the Clientelistic Exchange: A Survey of Four Argentine Provinces

dc.contributor.authorLisoni, Carlos Mariano
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-20T20:25:04Z
dc.date.available2019-08-20T20:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractAbstract: How do political parties guarantee enforcement of a clientelistic exchange? This research note empirically supports a catalog of clientelism compliance enforcement tactics. It also suggests that by focusing on the personalization of tactics and the constraints they place on individual voters, we can evaluate how intrusive these tactics are and further help to bridge existing instrumentalist and reciprocity theories of client compliance. The supporting evidence comes from interviews carried out with 73 elected Argentine local and provincial officials. How persuasive or coercive the tactics need to be to make clients comply with their part of the bargain has implications for our understanding of the legitimacy of the clientelistic bondage and our assessment of the roles of patrons and brokers in such exchanges.en
dc.format.extent25 pages
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.citationLisoni, Mariano. “Persuasion and Coercion in the Clientelistic Exchange: A Survey of Four Argentine Provinces Lisoni, Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 10, no. 1, 2018, pp. 133–56.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/23379
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJournal of Politics in Latin Americaen
dc.subjectPatron and client -- Argentinaen
dc.titlePersuasion and Coercion in the Clientelistic Exchange: A Survey of Four Argentine Provincesen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lisoni_ClientelisticExchange2018.pdf
Size:
350.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article with a new IUSB cover page
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.