Rigor, Reward, and Risk: Learning Leverage during National Board Candidacy
| dc.contributor.author | Hunzicker, Jana | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-18T18:38:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-03-18T18:38:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-10 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Learning leverage is characterized by three interactive dynamics: rigor, reward, and risk. Together, they create uncomfortable yet positive pressure that usually results in teacher learning. The model of learning leverage helps explain why most teachers consider National Board candidacy such a powerful learning experience and provides insight as to why some teachers learn much and others learn little through the experience. The model is applicable to learning experiences other than National Board candidacy, such as teacher professional development, mentoring and induction, and PK-16 classroom instruction. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hunzicker, Jana. 2009. "Rigor, Reward, and Risk: Learning Leverage during National Board Candidacy". Poster presented at the 6th annual conference for the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. October 22-25, 2009: Bloomington, IN. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2022/6800 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning | |
| dc.subject | Teacher learning | |
| dc.subject | National Board candidacy | |
| dc.subject | National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) | |
| dc.subject | NBPTS certification | |
| dc.subject | Professional development | |
| dc.title | Rigor, Reward, and Risk: Learning Leverage during National Board Candidacy | |
| dc.type | Presentation |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Collections
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us