Differences between Altmetric Data Sources - A Case Study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBar-Ilan, J.
dc.contributor.authorHalevi, G.
dc.contributor.authorMilojevic, Stasa
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T15:58:30Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T15:58:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-17
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the data accuracy and number of altmetric counts reported by Mendeley, altmetric.com and PlumX at two points in time: June 2017 and April 2018 for the dataset of 2,728 articles and reviews published in JASIST between 2001 and 2014. The findings show growth in the number of citations and Mendeley readers over time. In addition, the results also show that there are differences in the altmetric counts reported by the two-altmetric aggregators Altmetric.com and PlumX.
dc.identifier.citationBar-Ilan, J., et al. "Differences between Altmetric Data Sources - A Case Study." Journal of Altmetrics, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018-01-17, https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.4.
dc.identifier.otherBRITE 3265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2022/30442
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.29024/joa.4
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://journalofaltmetrics.org/articles/10.29024/joa.4/galley/12/download/
dc.relation.journalJournal of Altmetrics
dc.titleDifferences between Altmetric Data Sources - A Case Study

Files

Collections

Faculty Open Access Articles
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us