Early Buddhism and Incommensurability

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us

Date

2018-07-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Charles Goodman (henceforth G)’s Response to the thoughtful paper by Adrian Kuzminski (“Early Buddhism Reconsidered”) in this volume is actually devoted mainly to my book Greek Buddha (2015). Half a century ago, Thomas Kuhn famously coined the term incommensurability to refer to the inability or unwillingness of many scholars in a given field to understand substantially new (“revolutionary”) work. He describes their reactions against it and their attempts to suppress or discredit it. The reason for their response is that new discoveries advance science by challenging and displacing old beliefs and practices. Kuhn accurately describes G’s Response.

Description

This record is for a(n) offprint of an article published in Philosophy East and West on 2018-07-01.

Keywords

Citation

Beckwith, Christopher I. "Early Buddhism and Incommensurability." Philosophy East and West, vol. 68, no. 3, 2018-7-1.

Journal

Philosophy East and West

DOI

Link(s) to data and video for this item

Relation

Rights

Type