Early Buddhism and Incommensurability
Loading...
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
2018-07-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
Charles Goodman (henceforth G)’s Response to the thoughtful paper by Adrian Kuzminski (“Early Buddhism Reconsidered”) in this volume is actually devoted mainly to my book Greek Buddha (2015). Half a century ago, Thomas Kuhn famously coined the term incommensurability to refer to the inability or unwillingness of many scholars in a given field to understand substantially new (“revolutionary”) work. He describes their reactions against it and their attempts to suppress or discredit it. The reason for their response is that new discoveries advance science by challenging and displacing old beliefs and practices. Kuhn accurately describes G’s Response.
Description
This record is for a(n) offprint of an article published in Philosophy East and West on 2018-07-01.
Keywords
Citation
Beckwith, Christopher I. "Early Buddhism and Incommensurability." Philosophy East and West, vol. 68, no. 3, 2018-7-1.
Journal
Philosophy East and West