"Declinations with Disgorgement" in FCPA Enforcement
Can’t use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us
Date
2018-03-02
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Permanent Link
Abstract
This Article addresses the recent pretrial diversion scheme undertaken by the Department of Justice in conjunction with its Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Pilot Program—specifically, “declinations with disgorgement.” Pursuant to the Pilot Program, the Department of Justice declined to prosecute or even continue an investigation, provided the company disgorge its alleged ill-gotten gains. This Article dissects both the purpose of, and terminology used in, declinations with disgorgement and argues that this novel and creative pretrial diversion is a dangerous conflation of legal remedial theories and terms. A criminal disposition cannot be a declination with attendant penalties because either illegal activity occurred or it did not; prosecutorial discretion does not allow an “in-between” option of declination while simultaneously requiring disgorgement. Calling these dispositions “declinations” and the penalties associated therewith “disgorgement” is a wild misuse of the terms, which creates a crisis in the expressive function of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and in the legal lexicon itself.
Description
This record is for a(n) offprint of an article published in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform on 2018-03-02.
Keywords
Citation
Woody, Karen Elizabeth. ""Declinations with Disgorgement" in FCPA Enforcement." University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, vol. 51, 2018-3-2.
Journal
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform