Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cronin, Blaise
dc.contributor.author Ding, Ying
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-25T13:31:23Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-25T13:31:23Z
dc.date.issued 2011-01
dc.identifier.citation Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem, Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 80-96. (DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002). en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/9970
dc.description.abstract Citation analysis does not generally take the quality of citations into account: all citations are weighted equally irrespective of source. However, a scholar may be highly cited but not highly regarded: popularity and prestige are not identical measures of esteem. In this study we define popularity as the number of times an author is cited and prestige as the number of times an author is cited by highly cited papers. Information retrieval (IR) is the test field. We compare the 40 leading researchers in terms of their popularity and prestige over time. Some authors are ranked high on prestige but not on popularity, while others are ranked high on popularity but not on prestige. We also relate measures of popularity and prestige to date of Ph.D. award, number of key publications, organizational affiliation, receipt of prizes/honors, and gender. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Information Processing and Management en
dc.subject esteem en
dc.subject prestige en
dc.subject popularity en
dc.subject information retrieval en
dc.subject citation analysis en
dc.title Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics