mirage

The architecture of grammar in artificial grammar learning: Formal biases in the acquisition of morphophonology and the nature of the learning task

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Pisoni, David B en_US
dc.contributor.advisor DeJong, Kenneth J en_US
dc.contributor.author Kapatsinski, Vsevolod en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-15T16:58:12Z
dc.date.available 2011-05-14T11:53:36Z
dc.date.issued 2010-06-15T16:58:12Z
dc.date.submitted 2009 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/8606
dc.description Thesis (Ph.D.) - Indiana University, Linguistics, 2009 en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis introduces an experimental paradigm designed to test whether human language learners acquire product-oriented generalizations (e.g., "plurals must end in -i") and/or source-oriented generalizations (e.g., "add -i to the singular to form the plural"). The paradigm is applied to the morphophonological process of velar palatalization. Ecological validity of the paradigm is confirmed by comparison to corpus data from loanword adaptation in Russian. Characteristics of the training task are shown to influence whether the grammar extracted by a learner is largely product-oriented or largely source-oriented. This finding suggests that the shape of the grammar is influenced not only by innate biases of the learner (Universal Grammar) but also characteristics of the learning situation. Nonetheless, there are regularities that hold across training tasks and languages. First, learners extract both product-oriented and source-oriented generalizations. Thus, learners exposed to a lexicon of singular and plural forms learn at least 1) what typical plurals and singulars are like, 2) which segments of the singular form must be retained in the plural, and 3) which segments of the plural form must be retained in the singular. Second, learners appear to rely on schemas specifying which form classes and paradigmatic mappings are observed frequently (e.g., "plurals should end in -ti" or " a [k] in the singular corresponds to a [ti] in the plural"), rather than on constraints against underobserved form types (e.g., "plurals must not end in -ki"). Competing generalizations are weighted relative to each other stochastically. Thus, learners obey competing generalizations in proportion to how much statistical support each competitor receives from the training data, rather than obeying the most strongly supported competitor 100% of the time. Learners do not to obey the Subset Principle, which predicts that the learners should induce the most specific generalizations consistent with the training data. The observed overgeneralization patterns are shown to be expected if we assume a Bayesian approach to speech perception and word recognition, in which the output of perception is not the identity of the most likely structure but rather a probability distribution over possible structures. en_US
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University en_US
dc.subject bias en_US
dc.subject generalization en_US
dc.subject learning en_US
dc.subject morphology en_US
dc.subject phonology en_US
dc.subject productivity en_US
dc.subject.classification Language, Linguistics en_US
dc.subject.classification Psychology, Cognitive en_US
dc.subject.classification Psychology, Experimental en_US
dc.title The architecture of grammar in artificial grammar learning: Formal biases in the acquisition of morphophonology and the nature of the learning task en_US
dc.type Doctoral Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics