Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Ostrom, Elinor en Hayes, Tanya M. en 2010-06-01T22:02:04Z en 2027-02-01T23:02:04Z en 2010-06-11T14:13:38Z 2010-06-01T22:02:04Z en 2007 en
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description Thesis (PhD) - Indiana University, Political Science, 2007 en
dc.description.abstract Government legislation of protected areas is frequently prescribed as a means to protect forest lands. The effectiveness of protected areas is however, highly questionable as protected areas have been found to fail as often as they succeed. This dissertation takes a nuanced approach to forest policy analysis by examining how specific property rights interact with resource users' institutions to either promote or thwart frontier forest conservation. Frontier forests represent the last remaining swaths of tropical forest. They are also the homelands of indigenous peoples who have lived in these remote regions for centuries. A principal threat to frontier forests, and the people living within them, is agricultural expansion caused by mestizo (non-indigenous) migration. This study integrates methods that include institutional analysis, ethnographic fieldwork, and land-cover analysis to examine how property-rights policies influence agricultural expansion in the Mosquitia Forest Corridor, a biological corridor that runs from eastern Honduras into northern Nicaragua. I compare the ability to stop mestizo expansion in two protected areas in the Mosquitia: one reserve under government management and the other governed by native residents who hold common-property rights to their lands. The variation between sites creates opportune conditions to investigate whether property rights are a determining factor in preventing mestizo encroachment, and the impact that different property-rights policies have on residents' resource institutions and the broader resilience of the social and ecological systems. The study findings are that public policies that recognize local governance institutions promote resilient forest management systems. I find that native residents who hold common-property rights are better able to stop agricultural expansion than are public managers. Forests under indigenous territorial management are better conserved than those under public management. Furthermore, the analysis of institutional change finds that native residents are better able to address market and demographic pressures introduced by mestizo settlers when they are supported by public policies that recognize their common-property claims. en
dc.language.iso EN en
dc.publisher [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University en
dc.subject resilience en
dc.subject indigenous peoples en
dc.subject protected areas en
dc.subject forest conservation en
dc.subject common pool resource en
dc.subject institutional analysis en
dc.subject.classification Political Science, General en
dc.subject.classification Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife en
dc.title Forest Governance in a Frontier: An Analysis of the Dynamic Interplay between Property Rights, Land-Use Norms, and Agricultural Expansion in the Mosquitia Forest Corridor of Honduras and Nicaragua en
dc.type Doctoral Dissertation en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks

Advanced Search


My Account