Virtual reference service evaluation: Adherence to RUSA behavioral guidelines and IFLA digital reference guidelines
Loading...
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2008
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Permanent Link
Abstract
This study evaluates the level of adherence to professional guidelines by virtual (e-mail)
reference services. These professional guidelines are set up as standards to assure service quality; however, studies of virtual reference effectiveness rarely utilize these standards to measure reference success. This study evaluates and compares the level of adherence to two sets of professional guidelines that have been published by the International Federation of Library
Associations (IFLA) and the American Library Association (ALA) Reference and User Services
Association (RUSA). Analysis of 324 transactions from 54 libraries showed: 1) low levels of adherence to both sets of guidelines; 2) varied levels of adherence based on request types and user names on both sets of guidelines; 3) variation in institutional rank when different sets of
guidelines were utilized; 4) no correlation between user satisfaction and adherence to either set of guidelines. The implications of this study for future research and practice lie not only in its provision of a systematic way to analyze transactions in light of the ideal professional standards, but also in providing an empirical benchmark for virtual reference services evaluation.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Shachaf, P., & Horowitz, S. M. (2008). Virtual reference service evaluation: Adherence to RUSA behavioral guidelines and IFLA digital reference guidelines. LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH. 30 (2), 122-137.
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Article