Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Obeng, Samuel Gyasi
dc.date.accessioned 2008-07-28T14:03:57Z
dc.date.available 2008-07-28T14:03:57Z
dc.date.issued 1997
dc.identifier.citation Obeng, Samuel Gyasi. Communication strategies: persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse. Text 17, no.1 (1997): 25-51. en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/3157
dc.description.abstract Persuasive Akan judicial discourse includes a variety of effective strategies, among them the use of apologetic expressions or mitigators, deferential modes of reference, indirectly authored speech forms (e.g., tales, riddles, proverbs, etc. ), negotiation, complements, and acknowledgement of impositions. These persuasive strategies help legal professionals in dealing with the face-wants that arise in the judicial process. In this article, I demonstrate how Akan legal professionals, in persuading a chief and his elders to do what they will otherwise not do - pardon an appellant - employ one or more of these strategies to achieve their ends. en
dc.format.extent 3762623 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Mouton de Gruyter en
dc.rights This material is the copyright of Mouton de Gruyter. Please contact the publisher for information about reuse and reproduction. en
dc.rights.uri http://www.degruyter.com en
dc.subject Ghana en
dc.subject West Africa en
dc.subject discourse analysis en
dc.subject judicial process en
dc.title Communication strategies: persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse. en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics