Regime Switching, Learning, and the Great Moderation
Loading...
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2008-04-30
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research
Abstract
This paper examines the "bad luck" explanation for changing volatility in U.S. inflation and output when agents do not have rational expectations, but instead form expectations through least squares learning with an endogenously changing learning gain. It has been suggested that this type of endogenously changing learning mechanism can create periods of excess volatility without the need for changes in the variance of the underlying shocks. Bad luck is modeled into a standard New Keynesian model by augmenting it with two states that evolve according to a Markov chain, where one state is characterized by large variances for structural shocks, and the other state has relatively smaller variances. To assess whether learning can explain the Great Moderation, the New Keynesian model with volatility regime switching and dynamic gain learning is estimated by maximum likelihood. The results show that learning does lead to lower variances for the shocks in the volatile regime, but changes in regime is still significant in differences in volatility from the 1970s and after the 1980s.
Description
Keywords
CAEPR, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Learning, regime switching, great moderation, New Keynesian model, maximum likelihood, Monetary Economics
Citation
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
This paper is also available on SSRN and RePEc.
Relation
Rights
Type
Working Paper