Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bogenschneider, Bret N.
dc.contributor.author Abbott, Ryan
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-30T20:58:27Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-30T20:58:27Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Should Robots Pay Taxes? Tax Policy in the Age of Automation, 12 Harvard Law & Policy Rev. 145 (Abbott) (2017) (W&L top 50) (α). Held by Universersity of Surrey, SRI (Surrey Research Insight). en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23550
dc.description.abstract Abstract: Existing technologies can already automate most work functions, and the cost of these technologies is decreasing at a time when human labor costs are increasing. This, combined with ongoing advances in computing, artificial intelligence, and robotics, has led experts to predict that automation will lead to significant job losses and worsening income inequality. Policy makers are actively debating how to deal with these problems, with most proposals focusing on investing in education to train workers in new job types, or investing in social benefits to distribute the gains of automation. The importance of tax policy has been neglected in this debate, which is unfortunate because such policies are critically important. The tax system incentivizes automation even in cases where it is not otherwise efficient. That is because the vast majority of tax revenue is now derived from labor income, so firms avoid taxes by eliminating employees. More importantly, when a machine replaces a person, the government loses a substantial amount of tax revenue— potentially trillions of dollars a year in the aggregate. All of this is the unintended result of a system designed to tax labor rather than capital. Such a system no longer works once the labor is capital. Robots are not good taxpayers. We argue that existing tax policies must be changed. The system should be at least “neutral” as between robot and human workers, and automation should not be allowed to reduce tax revenue. This could be achieved by disallowing corporate tax deductions for automated workers, creating an “automation tax” which mirrors existing unemployment schemes, granting offsetting tax preferences for human workers, levying a corporate self-employment tax, or increasing the corporate tax rate. We argue the ideal solution may be a combination of these proposals. en
dc.description.sponsorship University of Surrey, School of Law en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Harvard University. Text held by University of Surrey, SRI (Surrey Research Insight) in an Institutional Repository Republished in: Economic Law Review (Chinese) en
dc.relation.isversionof http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/821099/1/Should%20Robots%20Pay%20Taxes.pdf en
dc.rights Copyright 2017 The Author(s). Reproduced with permission en
dc.subject artificial intelligence en
dc.subject AI en
dc.subject automation en
dc.subject tax policy en
dc.subject tax system incentive en
dc.subject tax revenue loss to AI en
dc.subject automation tax en
dc.title Should Robots Pay Taxes? Tax Policy in the Age of Automation en
dc.title.alternative Harvard Law & Policy Review en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics