The 2.5% Commitment: 2.5% of Whom?
No Thumbnail Available
If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to iusw@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2018-10-26
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Academic Libraries of Indiana
Permanent Link
Abstract
David Lewis proposed that libraries should commit approximately 2.5% of their budgets toward the creation of open access infrastructure for publishing. Though one can question the exact number necessary to accomplish these goals, the principle is laudable. Yet, there is another challenge. Librarians should not only commit 2.5% of their own internal resources; they also need to commit themselves to building a community containing at least 2.5% of faculty (across all disciplines), academic administrators (such as deans and grant managers), research funders (like the NSF or the Gates Foundation), and perhaps even some publishers (University presses and other open access ventures).
Why is this important? As a historian of scholarly communication, I can say that the system has always been in part about creating a community to disseminate research. The question of who should and who should not be in that community has evolved over time. In the 1840s, professional scholars sought to create exclusive domains including only a small number of people. One hundred years later with increasing government money, the public became a part of the community. Now, if librarians want to create a new scholarly communication system, it will be necessary to determine what community we want to build for the future, and how both 2.5% of our money and 2.5% of the community can come together to create that new system.
Description
Keywords
Communication in learning and scholarship, Library science, Open access publishing, Academic librarians, Library cooperation, Library finance, Academic freedom
Citation
DOI
Link(s) to data and video for this item
Relation
Rights
Type
Presentation