Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cocchiarella, Nino
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-06T16:07:59Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-06T16:07:59Z
dc.date.issued 2001-03
dc.identifier.citation Cocchiarella, N. "Logic and Ontology," in Axiomathes, vol, 12 issues 1-2 (2001): 117-150. en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/22324
dc.description This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Axiomathes. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012758003706 en
dc.description.abstract A brief review of the historical relation between logic and ontology and of the opposition between the views of logic as language and logic as calculus is given. We argue that predication is more fundamental than membership and that different theories of predication are based on different theories of universals, the three most important being nominalism, conceptualism, and realism.These theories can be formulated as formal ontologies, each with its own logic, and compared with one another in terms of their respective explanatory powers. After a brief survey of such a comparison, we argue that an extended form of conceptual realism provides the most coherent formal ontology and, as such, can be used to defend the view of logic as language. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Axiomathes en
dc.relation.isversionof https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1012758003706 en
dc.subject Cognitive Psychology en
dc.subject Explanatory Power en
dc.subject Formal Ontology en
dc.subject Conceptual Realism en
dc.title Logic and Ontology en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1023/A:1012758003706


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics