Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gliboff, Sander en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-06T11:12:59Z en
dc.date.available 2016-04-06T11:12:59Z en
dc.date.issued 2015 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/20790 en
dc.description.abstract Mendel's paper as part of a large body of nineteenth-century literature on practical plant- and animal breeding and experimental hybridization, which contained a confusing and contradictory assortment of observations on heredity, some in line with Mendel’s, but most not. After 1900, this literature was, in a sense, rediscovered along with Mendel, and it then played a dual role. For critics like W. F. R. Weldon, the non-Mendelian cases falsified Mendel’s laws. But for Mendel’s three co-rediscoverers, William Bateson, and others, they represented challenges to be met within a research program that would modify and extend Mendel’s system and establish a new scientific discipline. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.relation.isversionof Sander Gliboff, "The Mendelian and Non-Mendelian Origins of Genetics," Filosofia e História da Biologia 10, no. 1 (2015): 99–123 en
dc.relation.uri http://www.abfhib.org/FHB/FHB-10-1/FHB-10-1-07-Sander-Gliboff.pdf en
dc.subject Genetics en
dc.subject Mendelism en
dc.subject Gregor Mendel en
dc.subject Carl Correns en
dc.subject Hugo de Vries en
dc.subject Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg en
dc.subject William Bateson en
dc.title The Mendelian and Non-Mendelian Origins of Genetics en
dc.type Article en
dc.altmetrics.display false en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics