Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Carmines, Edward en
dc.contributor.author Bower-Bir, Jacob S. en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-10T17:10:09Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-10T17:10:09Z
dc.date.issued 2014-10 en
dc.date.submitted 2014 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/19418
dc.description Thesis (Ph.D.) - Indiana University, Political Science, 2014 en
dc.description.abstract This dissertation is about economic inequality and why it thrives in a country with professedly egalitarian values. I propose that people's economic behavior and policy preferences are largely driven by their understanding of deservingness. So long as a person believes that their compatriots are generally served their economic due, economic outcomes require no tampering, at least on moral grounds. People may tolerate grave inequalities &mdash inequalities that trouble them, even &mdash if they think those inequalities are deserved. Indeed, if outcomes appear deserved, altering them constitutes an unjust act. Resources meted to the undeserving, conversely, require correction. To begin, I show how desert unifies behavioral research into the otherwise disparate notions of justice that social scientists usually cite. Desert I treat as a social institution, one that helps resolve a common multiple-equilibria problem: the allocation of wealth and socioeconomic station. As a natural phenomenon emerging from repeated human interaction, individuals are motivated to ensure desert's reward. The precise definition of desert, however, will vary across cultures and individuals. I use surveys, survey experiments, and economic experiments to determine how different segments of the American population define economic desert. I then use those surveys and experiments to measure the extent to which different sub-populations believe that economic desert is actually rewarded. Finally, I show that these two variables -- definition of economic desert and faith in its reward -- shape an individual's willingness to redistribute wealth, both in the laboratory and through national policy, and often at a detriment to personal financial well-being. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University en
dc.rights Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0 US) en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ en
dc.subject Desert en
dc.subject Economic inequality en
dc.subject Experiments en
dc.subject Institutions en
dc.subject Natural justice en
dc.subject Redistribution en
dc.subject.classification Political Science en
dc.subject.classification Economics en
dc.subject.classification Public policy en
dc.title What We Deserve: The Moral Origins of Economic Inequality and Our Policy Responses to It en
dc.type Doctoral Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics