Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bialek, William
dc.date.accessioned 2013-12-03T15:18:04Z
dc.date.available 2013-12-03T15:18:04Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-28
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/17163
dc.description.abstract To a remarkable extent, our understanding of the natural world is built from a small set of very deep ideas. I’ll try to give some sense for the nature of these ideas, for their power and scope. I will also try to explain what we mean by “understanding” in several different contexts, and why these successes give us (measured) confidence that more complex problems may yet yield to our search for understanding. Finally, I’ll say a few words about the cultural gaps that separate scientists who have mastery of these theoretical ideas from other scientists, from the generally educated public, and from the polity as a whole. It is not too much to claim that our future quality of life will depend, crucially, on our ability to bridge these gaps by teaching. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Indiana University William T. Patten Foundation en_US
dc.relation.isversionof Click on the PURL link below in the "External Files" section to play this video. The audio-only mp3 file is also available below in the "Files" section. en_US
dc.relation.uri http://purl.dlib.indiana.edu/iudl/general/video/VAD1203
dc.title The Galilean imperative: A physicist's search for understanding 1- What have we learned, and how should we teach? en_US
dc.type Presentation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics