Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Stolterman, Erik
dc.contributor.author Beckwith, Lee
dc.contributor.author Chang, Wanling
dc.contributor.author Jiang, Hongyuan
dc.contributor.author Sulgrove, Alexander
dc.contributor.author White, Jeremy
dc.date.accessioned 2012-04-13T12:12:22Z
dc.date.available 2012-04-13T12:12:22Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/14359
dc.description.abstract To communicate a design can be seen as consisting of at least two aspects: presentation and argumentation. In our research we have taken on the task of studying how practicing interaction designers approach the challenge of presenting and arguing for their designs. We have chosen to label our object of study, or unit of analysis, a design argument. Based on three studies, we have developed a descriptive framework that can be used to describe, analyze, and compare design arguments. The paper ends with some discussions and reflections concerning the potential relevance, use, and implications of a framework of design arguments. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Technical Report Number: HCID-2012-003
dc.relation.ispartofseries Human-Computer Interaction Design (HCI/d) Program
dc.subject HCI en
dc.subject interaction design en
dc.subject practice en
dc.subject design arguments en
dc.title Design Arguments – an examination of how designers argue for their designs en
dc.type Technical Report en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics