IUScholarWorksIndiana University Libraries
Communities & Collections
All of IUScholarWorks
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
External Users Only:
New external user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your external user password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Lowder, Evan M."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A retrospective study of the role of probation revocation in future criminal justice involvement
    (Journal of Criminal Justice, 2024-07-01) Diaz, Carmen L.; Lowder, Evan M.; Northcutt Bohmert, Miriam; Ying, Michelle; Hatfield, Troy
    Purpose: Probation revocations and associated incarceration can have detrimental impacts on individuals, their families, and local jails and prisons. Yet, few studies have examined the potential long-term criminogenic effects of revocation. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective observational study examining whether probation revocation predicted future criminal justice contact. Methods: The sample included 1,873 probation clients who exited probation between 2014 and 2016 in Monroe County, Indiana. We used hierarchical logistic regression models to examine whether probation revocation predicted future criminal justice outcomes including any jail return, any felony charges, any violent charges, any prison return, and any probation return over a five-year follow-up. Results: After controlling for relevant covariates, probation revocation did not predict any of the five outcomes. However, low-risk clients experienced a criminogenic effect of technical violation revocations on the likelihood of returning to jail in the five-year follow-up period. Conclusions: Revocation broadly does not appear to influence future criminal justice contact. Instead, revocation seems to indicate that an individual is already following a trajectory of misconduct. Among low-risk probation clients however, technical violations are particularly harmful. Caution may be warranted when responding to technical violations committed by low-risk clients.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Re-Writing Rules of Supervision to Reduce Revocations with Action Research Teams
    (2024) Brady, Linda; Grommon, Eric; Hatfield, Troy; Lovins, Brian; Lowder, Evan M.; Northcutt Bohmert, Miriam; Ying, Michelle
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reducing Revocations Challenge: Monroe County, Indiana.
    (2021) Northcutt Bohmert, Miriam; Grommon, Eric; Lowder, Evan M.; Hatfield, Troy; Ying, Michelle; Diaz, Carmen
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Copyright © 2024 The Trustees of Indiana University