IUScholarWorksIndiana University Libraries
Communities & Collections
All of IUScholarWorks
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
External Users Only:
New external user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your external user password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Boon, Rachel"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Faculty Perceptions of Privatization at Public Universities
    ([Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University, 2010-06-15) Boon, Rachel; Priest, Douglas M.
    This study examined the knowledge and perceptions of faculty leaders at thirteen public universities in the United States to examine the degree to which they were aware of and involved in decisions to undertake privatization-related activities at their institution. In general, the importance of faculty in maintaining the institutional mission and supporting the public interest as reflected in their teaching, research, and service role necessitates understanding how faculty perceive these activities and their impacts. As a model of collaboration on decision-making, shared governance has historically provided a clear mode for faculty involvement with administrators and is supported by the American Association of University Professors. Faculty leaders were administered a survey based on their participation in a faculty senate or council at their respective institutions. Public universities with both high and low levels of state appropriations were included in the study for comparative purposes. Results of t-tests and logistic regression models indicated that many privatization activities are prevalent at both high and low state appropriation institutions, but that faculty leaders were more likely involved in budget and privatization discussions at the low appropriation (i.e. more privatized) institutions. Open-ended questions regarding the impact of these changes indicated concerns with faculty morale and retention.
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Copyright © 2024 The Trustees of Indiana University