2024-03-29T10:25:05Zhttps://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace-oai/requestoai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/3092021-10-18T19:07:42Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
DLI-2: Creating the Digital Music Library: Final Report to the National Science Foundation
Digital Library Program
NSF
Digital Music Library
Variations2
Software
Indiana University’s Variations2 Digital Music Library project focused on three chief areas of research and development: system architecture, including content representation and metadata standards; component-based application architecture; and network services. We tested and evaluated commercial technologies, primarily for multimedia and storage management; developed custom software solutions for the needs of the music library community; integrated commercial and custom software products; and tested and evaluated prototype systems for music instruction and library services, locally at Indiana University, and at a number of satellite sites, in the U.S. and overseas. This document is the project's final report to the National Science Foundation.
2006-09-27T16:28:21Z
2006-09-27T16:28:21Z
2006-09-27T16:28:21Z
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/309
en_US
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/4692021-10-18T19:19:52Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Final Report of the Indiana University Cyberinfrastructure Research Taskforce
Wheeler, Bradley
McRobbie, Michael
The Cyberinfrastructure Research Taskforce met during the 2004-05 academic year to consider Indiana University’s (IU) needs for shared cyberinfrastructure investments. In particular, the charge to the taskforce asked scholars to focus on needs that could help support a doubling of IU’s externally funded research by 2010-2011.
This report to the IU Vice President for Research & Information Technology conveys 10 specific recommendations. It recognizes both current progress in cyberinfrastructure development while also proposing new directions for cyberinfrastructure needs and opportunities.
In summary, the recommendations affirm a continuity of investment in the core IT infrastructure that is the foundation for advanced cyberinfrastructure. Developing deep capabilities for serving the complete
research data lifecycle emerged as a clear and pervasive theme across many disciplines. The recommendations provide guidance for storage capacity; data movement across networks; collection, annotation and provenance; and data publishing, curation, and custodianship. The taskforce advocated
“continuing without pause” renewed investment in IU’s High Performance Computing (HPC) systems and visualization facilities and strongly advocated HPC as a competitive necessity for data-intensive
scholarship.
Beyond the technology investments, the taskforce gave considerable analysis to scholars’ needs in making productive use of cyberinfrastructure. The taskforce recommends investments in an array of subsidized and chargeback consulting services, complexity-hiding interfaces, and training programs that each are discipline-facing in their orientation rather than a homogenized one-size-fits-all.
Finally, developing and sustaining advanced cyberinfrastructure will be impossible with only university sources of funding. The taskforce strongly advocates aggressive partnerships and leadership at the state,
national, and international levels to compete for all forms of external funding to continue incremental evolution of IU’s cyberinfrastructure.
The report itself provides many more details beyond these recommendations. Diverse scholarly endeavors are evolving their use of cyberinfrastructure in different ways. Nevertheless, the themes and specific recommendations presented here represent a resounding consensus view across these disciplines for the shared cyberinfrastructure needs of IU’s scholars.
2006-11-21T21:31:29Z
2006-11-21T21:31:29Z
2005-05
Other
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/469
en_US
The Trustees of Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/4712021-10-18T19:20:08Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Indiana University Information Technology Strategic Plan: Architecture for the 21st Century
Dunn, J. Michael
McRobbie, Michael
2006-11-21T21:37:06Z
2006-11-21T21:37:06Z
1998-05
Book
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/471
en_US
The Trustees of Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/30762021-10-18T23:00:12Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Open Source Collaboration in Higher Education: Guidelines and Report of the Licensing and Policy Framework Summit for Software Sharing in Higher Education
Wheeler, Brad
Greenstein, Daniel
Open Source
Community Source
Kuali
Sakai
Report of the October 2006 Summit held in Indianapolis, Indiana
Higher education has long valued the collaborative production and sharing of knowledge.
Thus, the rise of software communities powered by the near frictionless cost of the Internet
and open source software production techniques seems a natural fit for colleges and
universities. One vexing challenge, however, has been finding a common legal and policy
framework for software contributions, licensing, and distribution of collaboratively
developed work. In the absence of a common framework, heterogeneous policies and
licenses will remain an unhealthy drag on considerable economies that we can harness
when we benefit from others’ investments. Colleges and universities, as the primary beneficiary
of software sharing, must be proactive in creating, adopting, and advocating for a
common framework if we are to ever take full advantage of these opportunities.
We are grateful that the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation recognizes this problem and
funded the October 2006 gathering of some thought leaders to work on these
challenges. Our distinguished attendees were drawn from university legal counsel,
technology transfer offices, open source projects, governmental funding agencies, and
foundations, with representatives from multiple continents. We worked hard via
electronic communication before the summit, during two days of intensive face-to-face
discussions, and through much follow up afterward. The electronic communications were
open to all at http://collabtools.org.
This document is one of the work products of the summit, and it includes a set of
educational materials for an institution’s engagement with open source application
software. Action and implementation will be the key arbiter of value, and we urge
institutions, projects, and funding agencies to engage in the ongoing work of refining and
implementing the work started here.
2008-01-03T19:16:45Z
2008-01-03T19:16:45Z
2007-03
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/3076
en_US
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
© 2007 Trustees of Indiana University
Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0
Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/32642021-10-18T23:08:52Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Celebrating the Progress, 1998-2008, Continuing the Journey, Strategic Planning for Information Technology
Holloway, Janet R
information technology strategic plan indiana university office of the vice president for information techology
2008-12-09T16:35:48Z
2008-12-09T16:35:48Z
2008
Other
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/3264
en_US
Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/66892016-12-20T04:30:54Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Sakai: a case study in sustainability
Wheeler, Bradley C.
2010-01-20T15:52:11Z
2010-01-20T15:52:11Z
2007
Article
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/6689
en_US
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/cs-sakai.xml
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/uk/
Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales
University of Oxford
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/68232021-10-18T14:58:44Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Information Technology Strategic Plan – Architecture for the 21st Century
McRobbie, Michael A.
2010-03-26T17:25:26Z
2010-03-26T17:25:26Z
1998-05
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/6823
en_US
http://ovpit.iu.edu/strategic/
Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/134272021-10-18T08:01:04Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
The School of Business Policy Task Manual: Working Paper #92-524c
Wheeler, Bradley C.
Mennecke, Brian E.
2011-08-12T17:33:01Z
2011-08-12T17:33:01Z
1992
Working Paper
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/13427
en_US
Indiana University Graduate School of Business
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/143552021-10-19T01:43:35Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
ISWorld Task Repository
Mennecke, Brian (editors)
Wheeler, Bradley C.
2012-04-11T22:02:14Z
2012-04-11T22:02:14Z
2012-04-11T22:02:14Z
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/14355
en_US
http://kelley.iu.edu/bwheeler/isworld/index.cfm
ISWorld Net
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/146182021-10-19T02:10:30Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
A History of Academic Computing at Indiana University Bloomington 1940-2000
Haskett, James A.
2012-08-14T19:00:09Z
2012-08-14T19:00:09Z
1986
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/14618
en_US
Bloomington Academic Computing Services, Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/151862021-10-18T07:31:16Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Making the Business Case for IT Investments Through Facts, Faith, and Fear
Wheeler, Bradley C.
Marakas, George M.
This Teaching Note and the accompanying business cases (Consumer Products International and Biogenetica) were prepared Professors Bradley C. Wheeler and George M. Marakas of Indiana University (1999)
Business cases are an essential document for organizational investments in information technologies (IT). Yet, many organizations lack formal methods for writing, understanding, and acting on business cases. Similarly, IS courses have often struggled to adequately teach what students how to write business cases. The following are two actual business cases that were drawn from work with a real company. They are unaltered in any way except for disguising the name of the company. The use of two cases allows students to learn by contrasting the merits of grounding IT investments in arguments of fact, faith, or fear. A detailed teaching note is also provided. The cases have been used effectively with multiple MBA and Executive Education audiences.
2012-12-06T20:15:01Z
2012-12-06T20:15:01Z
1999
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/15186
en_US
Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/151902021-10-18T07:31:17Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Biogenetica San Jose ITSA Replacement: Business Case
Smith, Brian
Kumar, Ram
2012-12-10T18:25:42Z
2012-12-10T18:25:42Z
12/10/2012
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/15190
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/151912021-10-18T07:31:21Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Consumer Products International: Business Case
Martin, John
Beckam, Roger
Martin, Christopher
Cameron, James
2012-12-10T18:25:50Z
2012-12-10T18:25:50Z
12/10/2012
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/15191
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/185102021-10-18T07:31:25Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Indiana University’s Response to House Energy and Commerce Committee Request for Suggestions: 21st Century Cures: Leveraging Technology to Accelerate the #Path2Cures
Indiana University;
Stewart, Craig A.;
Barnett, William K.;
Shekar, Anantha;
Sheehan, Vincent;
Wasitis, Douglas A.;
Wheeler, Bradley C.
technology, economy, health care, translational research, advanced cyberinfrastructure
Indiana University embraces and supports the goals set out in the House Energy and Commerce Committee white paper “21st Century Cures: A Call to Action.” The state of Indiana, through collaborative efforts led by Indiana University, provides a model that can be adopted throughout the US. The combination of willingness to collaborate across public/private boundaries, a high performance network, and a cyberinfrastructure suitable for research using private and protected health records, is enabling the state of Indiana to accelerate new discoveries and their rapid translation into everyday medical practice and improved quality of life. Similar collaborations in other states and between states across the country would accelerate the delivery of medical breakthroughs and improve healthcare delivery and lower costs across the country.
2014-07-24T19:50:34Z
2014-07-24T19:50:34Z
2014-07-24
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/18510
en_US
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Copyright 2014 by The Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/191642021-10-18T12:34:36Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Indiana University Digitization Master Plan
Lewis, David
Plale, Beth
Indiana University, Digitization Master Plan, DMP, Digitization, Media Preservation
In his State of the University address on October 1, 2013, Indiana University President Michael McRobbie emphasized that universities have a critical role to play in the preservation of knowledge. In keeping with this goal, President McRobbie announced a charter for an Indiana University Digitization Master Plan (DMP). The DMP is to look beyond time-based media and formulate a university-wide roadmap to digitize and store in some form all of our existing collections judged by experts and scholars to be of lasting importance to research and scholarship, and to ensure the preservation of all new research and scholarship at IU that is born digital.
2014-11-20T23:20:11Z
2014-11-20T23:20:11Z
2014-11-20
Technical Report
Lewis, David and Plale, Beth. Indiana University Digitization Master Plan. Indiana University. 2014. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/2022/19164
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/19164
en_US
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Except where otherwise noted, the contents of this presentation are copyright of the Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). This license includes the following terms: You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to remix - to adapt the work under the following conditions: attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/200372021-10-18T15:13:47Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Empowering People: Indiana University's Strategic Plan for Information Technology 2009
Wheeler, Brad
Acito, Frank
information technology. IT, leadership, pervasive, excellence, education, teaching, learning, research, life sciences, Sate of Indiana, grand challenges, community, University Information Technology Committee, research, human-centric
Empowering People: Indiana University’s Strategic Plan for Information Technology, was developed in response to a charge by IU President Michael A. McRobbie “...to develop the pervasive use of IT to help build excellence in education and research in all disciplines, in administration, in IU’s engagement in the life of the state, across all campuses, and in collaboration with IU’s key partners such as Clarian Health and institutions of higher education.” The plan follows the 1998 IT Strategic Plan style and anticipates a five-year implementation horizon, but its work will proceed through continuous, incremental improvement wherever feasible. Its 15 major recommendations set direction and aspirational outcomes for the university. Seventy-two supporting action items mobilize implementation. Over 140 IU community members from all campuses — students, faculty, and staff — and alumni contributed to developing the plan. It includes input from essential partners such as Clarian Health, the Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, and campus communities. It has been presented to 85 groups across all campuses and received over 150 emailed comments on its preliminary draft. Professor Frank Acito of the Kelley School of Business directed the development of the plan as Chairman of the University Information Technology Committee and its members.
2015-06-01T16:53:02Z
2015-06-01T16:53:02Z
2009
Plan or blueprint
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/20037
en_US
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Copyright 2009 by the Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/205682021-10-18T11:23:31Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Office of the Vice President for IT and CIO at Indiana University Cyberinfrastructure Value Assessment Report
DeStefano, Lizanne
Rivera, Lorna
cyberinfrastructure
resources
funding
education
training
support
investment
ROI
faculty
compute
storage
In September 2014, the Indiana University (IU) Office of the Vice President for IT and CIO (OVPIT) requested an independent value assessment of IU’s cyberinfrastructure (CI) from the perspective of current and former IU faculty. This report includes the detailed findings of the assessment and provides recommendations for improving the value of IU’s services to faculty.
2015-12-21T16:20:02Z
2015-12-21T16:20:02Z
2015-01
Preprint
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/20568
en_US
Copyright held by Dr. Lizanne DeStefano, Director and Lorna Rivera, Senior Research Specialist, of the I-STEM Education Initiative at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site that may go beyond "fair use" of such copyrighted material as provided in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
I-STEM Education Initiative University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/209902021-10-18T11:06:01Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Cyberinfrastructure Value Assessment Report
DeStefano, Lizanne
Rivera, Lorna
2016-09-12T14:55:38Z
2016-09-12T14:55:38Z
2015-01
Technical Report
DeStefano, L. & Rivera L. (2015). Cyberinfrastructure value assessment report. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2022/20990
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/20990
en_US
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
Except where otherwise noted, the contents of this presentation are copyright of the Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). This license includes the following terms: You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to remix - to adapt the work under the following conditions: attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/210642021-10-18T12:00:13Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Toward a National Higher Education Networking Infrastructure
Almes, Guy
Aupperle, Eric
Brim, Scott
Cogger, Dick
Corbato, Steve
Gale, Doug
Gorgan, Jim
Graves, Bill
Griffin, Steve
Gulbranson, Roger
Hobby, Russ
Lambert, Dave
Lewis, Bill
Lynn, Stuart
Mambretti, Joe
Peters, Paul Evan
Rubbens, Allan
Staman, E. Michael
Summerhill, Craig
Veach, Ross
Wasley, David
Williams, Jim
2016-10-31T19:57:06Z
2016-10-31T19:57:06Z
1996
Working Paper
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/21064
en_US
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
Except where otherwise noted, the contents of this presentation are copyright of the Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). This license includes the following terms: You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to remix - to adapt the work under the following conditions: attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/216902021-10-18T16:33:32Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
The Indiana Metabolomics and Cytomics Initiative Final Report
McRobbie, Michael
2017-09-20T15:46:03Z
2017-09-20T15:46:03Z
2013-01-29
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/21690
en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/220132021-10-19T03:01:03Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Textbook Pricing Analysis
Dennis, Alan
Indiana University; textbooks; textbook pricing
2018-04-06T13:55:15Z
2018-04-06T13:55:15Z
2009-05
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/22013
en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/221342021-10-19T03:39:16Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Midterm Assessment: The Indiana University Information Technology Plan
Gannon, Dennis B.
Report to Vice President Michael McRobbie by the University Information Technology Committee, with members listed below:
Gannon, Dennis (chair)
Andrews, Moya
Cronin, Blaise
Huffman, John
Oakman, Jacob
Randolph, J.C.
Landess, Jackie
McBride, Angela
Plater, William
Schneider, William
Stocum, David
Dunn, J. Michael
Thorin, Suzanne
Desai, Mayur
Moran, Bob
Shapiro, Susan
Miller, Ted (chair, UIS Task force)
Jay, Sreven (chair, Telecom Taskforce)
Sept, Jeanne (chair, TUT Taskforce)
Palakal, Mathew (chair, RAC 'foskforce)
Billings, Diane (chair, IN ITC)
Mand, Larry (chair, CCDs)
We would like to begin this midterm assessment with a brief statement of overall findings. It is the opinion of the UITC that extraordinary strides have been made by the Office of the Vice President for Information Technology (OVPIT ), by University Information Technology Services (UITS), and by other agencies within the university to achieve the vision outlined in the IT Strategic Plan. In some cases, such as advanced networking, progress has exceeded expectations; in this and other areas, the university is recognized as a national leader; and in many areas, while much progress has been made, further challenges remain. This midterm assessment contains a number of recommendations for midcourse revision or shifting emphases, yet the briefest summary of our findings and our strongest recommendation to OVPIT and UITS would be: "Well done! Press on!" Indeed, the greatest challenge for the remaining two years of the IT Strategic Plan may be to sustain the progress achieved during the first three years, as the State's fiscal crisis threatens to put all these accomplishments in jeopardy. Progress toward the goals set in the various Recommendations and Actions of the Information Technology Strategic Plan has been supported through the internal reallocation of funds within UITS and OVPIT, and through State appropriations of technology funds in thel 999-2001 biennium and again in the 2001-2003 biennium. Additional State support was appropriated for the Abi.lene Network Operations Center, the I-Light optical fiber infrastructure (which connects IUB and Purdue West Lafayette with Indianapolis and IUPUI), and the State GigaPoP. Moreover, in the 1999 and 2001 sessions of the Indiana Legislature, funds were appropriated and bonding authority given to construct a building on the IUPUI campus that will house classrooms, laboratories, departments, centers, and institutes that have IT as a significant part of their programs and curricula. These resources have made information technology a major force in promoting the excellence of learning, teaching and research at Indiana University. The UITC fully appreciates the State's fiscal crisis, and we know that Indiana University is committed to cooperating with and assisting the State as we work through current economic difficulties. Spending reductions proposed by the Governor include reduced appropriations to higher education. These cuts will be very painful, particularly as they would affect planned investments in information technology. We know that IU will make every effort to protect the academic mission of the university, so that research, teaching, learning and service are not adversely affected. However, the UITC also believes that Indiana University already plays a leadership role in enhancing the State's economy by building upon our strengths in information technology, thereby fostering growth and opportunity for all Hoosiers in the New Economy.
2018-05-23T19:20:45Z
2018-05-23T19:20:45Z
2001-12-30
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/22134
en
Bloomington, Indiana : Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/221352021-10-19T03:29:01Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Foundations for Innovation: Information Technology at Indiana University
Adams, Karen
Aune, Kirk
Bernbon, Gerry
Boschmann, Erwin
Cromwell, Dennis
Donaldson, David
Dunn, Michael
Egolf, Michael
Elmore, Garland
Fitzpatrick, Christine
Halbrook, Michael
Holland, Norma
Jung, Diane
Mand, Larry
McRobbie, Michael
Moore, Greg
Pearson, Doug
Peebles, Christopher
Reynolds, Steve
Stephan, Bill
Steward, Don
Stewart, Craig
Voss, Brian
Waren, Marsha
Welty, Gordon
Wernet, Eric
Wernet, Julie
Williams, Jim
This booklet describes information technology (IT) on the campuses of Indiana University, principally the infrastructure and services, but also some of the main academic programs in this area. IT is fundamental to the future of teaching, learning, and research in modern American research universities and it is the foundation for innovation, on which America's continuing global leadership in higher education depends. IT is a transformational force of enormous power and potential for the whole of higher education, nationally and globally. In the pages that follow the wide-ranging scope and scale of IU' s uses and applications of IT are described. From this it will be clear that IT extends into nearly every part of the University and is a vital tool for academic leadership.
2018-05-23T19:22:09Z
2018-05-23T19:22:09Z
2000
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/22135
en
Bloomington, Indiana : Indiana University
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/221362018-05-23T20:32:42Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
IU Pervasive Technology Institute (pti.iu.edu) – example Use Case Templates
craig, stewart
use case, architecture
Included in this document are editable (word format) templates for use case descriptions based on Malan, R. and D. Bredemeyer. Functional Requirements and Use Cases Architecture Resources for Enterprise Advantage. 2001. http://www.bredemeyer.com/pdf_files/functreq.pdf
2018-05-23T20:32:42Z
2018-05-23T20:32:42Z
2018
Technical Report
http://hdl.handle.net/2022/22136
en
Released under cc by 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/271312022-02-09T08:05:07Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Indiana University Life Science Strategic Plan
Brater, D.C.
McRobbie, Michael
Pescovitz, O.H.
Stewart, Craig A.
Subbaswamy, K.R.
The Indiana University Life Sciences Strategic Plan will channel the University’s core strengths
in the life sciences toward a common purpose, and challenges the University to forge new areas
of excellence. The combined strengths of the life sciences enterprises at IU’s two major
campuses, in Indianapolis (IUPUI) and Bloomington (IUB), together with important
contributions from IU’s regional campuses, create possibilities and opportunities at Indiana
University that allow us to compete effectively with the best research universities in the country. Indiana University’s excellence in information technology serves as a foundation for life sciences research and as an enabler of collaboration among Indiana University’s scientists.
Together, these many assets will enable IU scientists to understand genetic information and how that genetic information is processed and expressed to make us what we are. Such understanding will create new opportunities for genomic researchers and cancer clinicians, behavioral scientists and neurobiologists, analytical chemists, and model systems biologists. IU scientists, working together in new ways, will create new opportunities to apprehend solutions to medical problems that were formerly beyond our grasp.
2022-02-08T16:04:39Z
2022-02-08T16:04:39Z
2006
Plan or blueprint
Brater, D.C, M.A. McRobbie, O.H. Pescovitz, C.A. Stewart, K.R. Subbaswamy. 2006. Indiana University Life Science Strategic Plan. Indiana University. 62 pp.
https://hdl.handle.net/2022/27131
en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/271342022-02-09T08:04:28Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Research in Indiana
Stewart, Craig A.
From 2000 to 2003 universities within the State of Indiana collaborated to present a unified research exhibit at the annual SC (SuperComputing) conference on High Performance Networking and Computing. The SCxy conference, as it is known, is the top international conference in supercomputing and advanced networking. That a group of universities banded together to collectively show off the accomplishments of an entire state made quite an impression at this conference. Never before had this been done, and now several other states have copied this model. Core partners in this collaboration were Indiana University and Purdue University; these universities participated each year. The University of Notre Dame and the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology participated some but not all years. 2002 was one of the years in which all four universities participated. This handout was the basic “display brochure” that explained the goals of this collaborative display.
2022-02-08T16:13:13Z
2022-02-08T16:13:13Z
2002
Technical Report
Office for the Vice President of Information Technology. 2002. Research in Indiana. Indiana University. SC2002 High Performance Networking and Computing Conference, Baltimore, MD, November, 2002.
https://hdl.handle.net/2022/27134
en
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/271332022-02-09T08:02:49Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Pervasive Technology Labs at Indiana University
McRobbie, Michael
Stewart, Craig A.
2022-02-08T16:11:10Z
2022-02-08T16:11:10Z
2002
Other
Office for the Vice President of Information Technology. 2002. Pervasive Technology Labs at Indiana University
https://hdl.handle.net/2022/27133
en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/271322022-02-09T08:03:07Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
MetaCyte Initiative
Stewart, Craig A.
The Indiana University Metabolomics and Cytomics Initiative (MEtaCyte) was an IU research program funded by a $43M grant from the Lilly Endowment, Inc. (a private charitable trust with no relationships to Lilly. Inc.). It can rightfully be considered to be an IU-Bloomington analog to INGEN. This grant award funded a variety of research initiatives in biological sciences and related areas of technology. This brochure explains the goals, structure, and leadership of MetaCyte. The fruits of the MetaCyte Initiative live on today in several forms. MetaCyte contributed to the formation of the Indiana Resilience Initiative, the Light Imaging Microscopy Center, and contributed to the sustainability of the Pervasive Technology Labs and its transformation into the Pervasive Technology Institute.
2022-02-08T16:06:57Z
2022-02-08T16:06:57Z
2006
Technical Report
Indiana University. 2006. MetaCyte Initiative. Indiana University. 16 pp.
https://hdl.handle.net/2022/27132
en
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/271352022-02-09T08:04:15Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Proceedings of the Indiana University Forum on Digital Libraries
Stewart, Craig A.
The Indiana University Digital Libraries program was a collaboration of the IU Libraries, the Office of the Vice President for Information Technology, the School of Library and Information Science, and the School of Informatics (the latter two organizations now integrated into the IU Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering). This 2002 symposium brought together people involved in the Digital Library Program (DLP) along with many faculty members to outline the accomplishments of and the services provided by the DLP. The DLP was years later ended as a formal collaboration largely because it had achieved its goals: modern information technology services were integrated into the activities of the IU Libraries; appreciation for and collaboration with librarians was integrated into the IT organization, and informatics and library science are integrated into the Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Technology. Activities that were once components of the DLP continue on as management groups or research groups within the Pervasive Technology Institute. This forum was organized primarily by Gerald Bernbom, one of the Directors of the Research and Academic Computing Division of University Information Technology Services and a leader within the DLP. It was sadly one of Bernbom’s last major professional achievements prior to his untimely death in 2003.
2022-02-08T16:15:46Z
2022-02-08T16:15:46Z
2002-04-16
Other
Proceedings of the Indiana University Forum on Digital Libraries. 2002. Held April 16, 2002, Indiana Memorial Union, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
https://hdl.handle.net/2022/27135
en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oai:scholarworks.iu.edu:2022/271302022-02-09T08:05:48Zcom_2022_12991com_2022_356com_2022_19673col_2022_13014
Innovation through collaboration
Stewart, Craig A.
In 2008 what had been known as the Pervasive Technology Labs was transformed into the Pervasive Technology Institute thanks to a $15M grant from the Lilly Endowment, Inc. (a private charitable trust with no relationships to Lilly. Inc.). “Innovation through collaboration” was the initial catchphrase for the Pervasive Technology Institute (PTI). This document was published in 2010 as an explanation of PTI’s goals, technical strengths, and personnel. It was widely used at conferences and public relations events and to this day is one of the best explanations available of the logic behind the structure of the Pervasive Technology Institute and of its goals in research, education, and service to the State of Indiana and the US as a whole.
2022-02-08T16:00:07Z
2022-02-08T16:00:07Z
2010
Technical Report
Office of the Vice President for Information Technology. 2010. Innovation through collaboration. 42 pages. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
https://hdl.handle.net/2022/27130
en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/